
Andre Gonzales
Better then the original I think. Was pretty funny. I thought the comedy was better then the original too.


Movie spotlight
20 years since their first adventure, Lloyd and Harry go on a road trip to find Harry's newly discovered daughter, who was given up for adoption.
Twenty years after their first adventure, Harry and Lloyd embark on a new journey to find one of Harry's long-lost children in order to receive a kidney transplant. Their quest leads them across the country, encountering eccentric characters and escalating their signature brand of chaotic idiocy. Along the way, they stumble into a conspiracy involving a deadly assassin and a brilliant but vindictive inventor.
Dumb and Dumber To received generally negative reviews from critics, with many finding it to be a pale imitation of the original. While some praised the return of Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels' comedic chemistry, most felt the humor was dated and relied too heavily on gross-out gags. Audience reception was somewhat more favorable, though still mixed.
Relies too heavily on callbacks and gross-out humor, failing to recapture the magic of the original.
Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels still possess some comedic chemistry, but it's not enough to salvage the weak script.
A disappointing sequel that feels both unnecessary and uninspired.
Google audience: Audiences were divided, with many feeling the film lacked the original's charm and relied on a predictable, often crude, sense of humor. Some viewers appreciated the return of the beloved characters and found moments of genuine laughter, but the overall sentiment was that it did not live up to the legacy of the first film.
The film reunited the Farrelly brothers with Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels, who had not worked together since the original 'Dumb and Dumber' in 1994.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources

Better then the original I think. Was pretty funny. I thought the comedy was better then the original too.