From Dusk Till Dawn 2: Texas Blood Money

Following the events of the first film, a group of bank robbers led by Sean and Edgar McGraw steal a sacred Native American artifact containing blood from a vampire. Unbeknownst to them, this blood imbues them with vampiric powers, turning them into a new breed of bloodthirsty creatures. As they try to escape the authorities and a shadowy organization known as the "Consortium" that seeks the artifact, they descend further into their monstrous new existence.

The film received overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics and audiences, often cited as a significant step down from its predecessor. It was criticized for its weak plot, uninspired direction, and lack of the original's unique blend of horror and action, instead leaning heavily into a less engaging gore-fest.

• A derivative and poorly executed sequel that fails to capture the spirit of the original.

• Lacks the creative flair and engaging characters that made the first film a cult hit.

• More interested in cheap thrills and gore than in developing a coherent or interesting story.

Google audience: Google users largely found the film to be a disappointing and uninspired sequel. Many felt it lacked the originality and excitement of the original 'From Dusk Till Dawn', and was filled with excessive violence and a weak plot. Some acknowledged a few entertaining action sequences but overall, the consensus was negative.

The film was shot in South Africa, with many of the crew members also working on the first film.