Elementary Genocide 3
Elementary Genocide 3

Movie spotlight

Elementary Genocide 3

2017
Movie
73 min
English

World renowned journalist, and award-winning filmmaker Rahiem Shabazz presents the third installment of his docu-series Elementary Genocide: Academic Holocaust. The first two documentaries in the series; The School To Prison Pipeline and Elementary Genocide 2: The Board Of Education vs. The Board of Incarceration received critical acclaim and launched Shabazz as a political pundit and academic ambassador for the African American community. Elementary Genocide: Academic Holocaust adds more statistical proof of the scholastic inequalities faced by Original people around the country. The documentary revisits the importance of education and its impact on self-image, family structure, financial freedom, and the collective future of African/indigenous people in America and abroad.

Insights

IMDb3.7/10
Director: Richard AllynGenres: Action, Horror, Thriller

Plot Summary

Following the aftermath of a devastating event, a group of survivors struggles to stay alive in a world overrun by a deadly, unknown force. They must band together and use their wits to combat the escalating threat and find a safe haven. As their numbers dwindle and paranoia sets in, they uncover dark secrets about the origin of the genocide and the true nature of their enemy.

Critical Reception

Elementary Genocide 3 received mixed to negative reviews from critics and audiences. While some acknowledged the film's ambitious attempt at a post-apocalyptic horror narrative, many criticized its predictable plot, underdeveloped characters, and inconsistent pacing. The low-budget production values were also frequently cited as a detractor.

What Reviewers Say

  • Presents a grim post-apocalyptic scenario but struggles with execution.

  • Lacks originality and relies on common horror tropes.

  • Low production quality detracts from the overall viewing experience.

Google audience: Audience reception for Elementary Genocide 3 is largely unenthusiastic. Common complaints include a lack of engaging characters, a derivative storyline, and poor special effects. Some viewers appreciated the attempt at a gritty, survival-focused narrative but found the execution to be lacking.

Fun Fact

The film was shot on a very limited budget, with much of the cast and crew contributing their time and resources to complete the project.

AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources

My Review