Afterwards

A successful but emotionally detached lawyer, Clara, learns from a doctor that she has a terminal illness and only a short time to live. This news prompts her to re-evaluate her life and seek out the doctor, a man who claims to be able to see and interact with the 'afterlife'. As Clara delves into this unusual connection and confronts her mortality, she begins to find a new perspective on life and relationships.

The film received mixed to negative reviews from critics, with many finding its philosophical themes and supernatural elements underdeveloped or pretentious. While some praised the performances of its lead actors and its contemplative mood, others criticized the pacing and the ambiguity of its narrative, leading to a generally lukewarm reception from both critics and audiences.

• Ponderous and overly philosophical with a muddled narrative.
• The central premise involving the afterlife and a 'seer' is intriguing but poorly executed.
• Performances are adequate, but cannot save the film from its lack of clarity and emotional depth.

Google audience: Audience reviews indicate disappointment with the film's slow pace and confusing plot, with many finding it difficult to connect with the characters or the central themes. While a few appreciated the attempt at a thoughtful exploration of life and death, the majority felt the film was ultimately unsatisfying and pretentious.

The film is based on the novel 'Et après' by Guillaume Musso.