Waxwork II: Lost in Time

A young woman, Sarah, is put on trial for the murder of her boyfriend, Mark, who was killed in a mysterious exhibit at a wax museum. The only witness is Mark's friend, David, who claims a curse and time travel were involved. To prove Mark's innocence and their adventure through different historical periods, David must gather evidence from the cursed wax figures before Sarah is convicted.

Waxwork II: Lost in Time received largely negative reviews from critics, with many finding it to be a convoluted and less engaging sequel than its predecessor. While some appreciated its ambitious scope and visual effects, the plot was often criticized for being nonsensical and difficult to follow. Audience reception was similarly lukewarm, with the film failing to gain significant traction.

• The film attempts to expand on the concept of the original but falters due to a weak and confusing plot.
• While visually varied with its time-traveling elements, the narrative struggles to maintain coherence.
• It's often seen as a step down from the first film, lacking its charm and B-movie appeal.

Google audience: Audience reviews are scarce, but generally reflect a disappointment with the sequel's narrative complexity and a perceived lack of the original's unique, quirky horror charm.

The film features cameos from several actors known for their roles in horror films, including Peter Cushing and David Warner, although their scenes were filmed prior to Cushing's death and then edited into the movie.