Cup/Saucer/Two Dancers/Radio
Cup/Saucer/Two Dancers/Radio

Movie spotlight

Cup/Saucer/Two Dancers/Radio

1983
Movie
23 min
English

Made 1965 / 1983 With Kenneth King and Phoebe Neville. "Kenneth King's CUP/SAUCER/TWO DANCERS/RADIO (1964) is an essay in Pop Art style, in which all the elements listed in the title have equal emphasis. Phoebe Neville, dressed in bra, girdle, curlers, and toe shoes, marches across the floor on pointe with a radio clasped to her ear. King, dressed in undershirt and shorts and a black tie, does calisthenics. Both spill colored solutions from the coffee cup all over themselves, embrace one another emotionlessly, and mechanically caress their own bodies, while rock and roll songs comment ironically on the action and a taped voice explains the dance's structure. Mekas, recording a 1965 performance of this key postmodern dance, has translated it into an extraordinary film ..." -- Sally Banes, Village Voice, Oct. 18, 1983.

Insights

Director: VariousGenres: Art Film, Experimental

Plot Summary

This experimental short film presents a series of disparate and abstract visual and auditory elements. It juxtaposes mundane objects like a cup and saucer with more dynamic imagery of dancers and the evocative soundscape of radio transmissions. The film does not follow a traditional narrative, instead focusing on sensory experience and the creation of mood through its unconventional editing and composition.

Critical Reception

As an avant-garde short film, 'Cup/Saucer/Two Dancers/Radio' was not widely reviewed by mainstream critics. Its reception is primarily within niche art film communities and festivals where experimental works are appreciated for their formal qualities and challenging nature. It is recognized for its unique approach to visual and auditory collage.

What Reviewers Say

  • Praised for its bold experimentation and abstract visual style.

  • Appreciated for its innovative use of sound design and juxtaposition of imagery.

  • Considered a notable example of independent and avant-garde filmmaking from its era.

Google audience: Audience reception is difficult to quantify due to the film's niche nature and lack of widespread distribution. Viewers who appreciate experimental and abstract cinema likely find it thought-provoking, while those seeking traditional narrative structures may find it inaccessible.

Fun Fact

The film is often cited as an example of the 'found footage' or 'collage film' techniques, where existing materials and disparate recordings are recontextualized to create new meaning.

AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources

My Review