Movie spotlight
In the year of 754 AD, during a time of epic battles and bloodshed, the legend of the pagan warrior king, Rebad, is born, but so is a new weapon against his people: Christianity. Redbad must ultimately unite a Viking army powerful enough to defeat the seemingly invincible Franks.
In the 8th century, the Frisian people face oppression from the Franks. The young and impulsive Redbad, son of the king, must overcome his own recklessness and unite his people against their tyrannical invaders. He grapples with loss, betrayal, and the weight of leadership as he fights for the freedom of his homeland and its pagan traditions.
The film 'Redbad' received a mixed to negative reception from critics, with many finding its historical accuracy questionable and its narrative pacing uneven. While some praised the ambitious scope and action sequences, others criticized the dialogue and character development. Audience reception was similarly divided, with some appreciating the historical drama aspect and others pointing out its shortcomings.
Praised for its historical ambition and visual presentation of the era.
Criticized for a predictable plot and underdeveloped characters.
Found by some to be an entertaining, albeit historically liberties-taking, action-adventure.
Google audience: Audience feedback on Google is not readily available.
The film is based on the historical figure King Radboud of Frisia, who famously refused to be baptized into Christianity.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources
If you have watched any of Michael Hirst's "Vikings" series then you will probably find this to be a potted version of some of those stories condensed (though it doesn't always feel like it) into 2½ hours or so. Essentially our eponymous he...