72 HOURS

In a near-future London, a brilliant but disgraced scientist has 72 hours to prevent a catastrophic biological weapon, accidentally released from his own lab, from infecting the city. He must race against time, evade government agents, and confront his past mistakes to find a cure before millions perish. The fate of the metropolis rests on his ability to trust a former colleague and navigate a city on the brink of panic.

72 Hours received a mixed to positive reception from critics, who praised its tense atmosphere, strong performances, and timely themes. However, some found the plot predictable and the pacing uneven in the latter half. Audiences generally responded well to the film's suspense and visual style.

• Praised for its gripping premise and Cillian Murphy's compelling lead performance.

• Criticized for a few plot contrivances and a slightly rushed conclusion.

• Applauded for its relevant commentary on scientific responsibility and societal response to crisis.

Google audience: Audiences lauded the film's intense suspense and the believable portrayal of a city under threat. Many found the scientific elements intriguing and the race against time captivating, though some wished for a more surprising narrative twist.

Nominated for Best Original Screenplay at the BAFTA Awards.

The distinctive sound design for the biological agent's spread was created using manipulated recordings of everyday household objects, aiming to make the threat feel both alien and unsettlingly familiar.