
Andre Gonzales
Not any where close to being as good as the first. At least it still has Nicholas Cage. He's the only one from part one in this movie. It's just an ok movie.


Movie spotlight
When the devil resurfaces with aims to take over the world in human form, Johnny Blaze reluctantly comes out of hiding to transform into the flame-spewing supernatural hero Ghost Rider -- and rescue a 10-year-old boy from an unsavory end.
Johnny Blaze, living in seclusion and trying to control his fiery alter ego, is recruited by a monastic order to protect a young boy from the devil, who desires the child's soul to solidify his human form. Blaze must confront his past and unleash the Ghost Rider to save the boy and prevent the world from falling into darkness.
Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance was met with overwhelmingly negative reviews from critics and was a box office disappointment. While some acknowledged the continuation of the dark, gritty tone established by the directors, most found the film to be nonsensical, overly violent, and lacking in coherent storytelling and character development. Nicolas Cage's performance was a frequent point of discussion, often described as erratic and over-the-top.
Critics widely panned the film for its convoluted plot and excessive, often gratuitous, violence.
Nicolas Cage's performance was frequently cited as distractingly eccentric, further detracting from any potential seriousness.
The visual effects and action sequences were seen as a weak attempt to compensate for a lack of substance.
Google audience: Audience reviews largely mirrored critical sentiment, with many viewers finding the movie loud, nonsensical, and ultimately unenjoyable. Common complaints included the weak story, poor dialogue, and a general sense of disappointment compared to expectations.
Nominated for 2 Golden Raspberry Awards: Worst Actor (Nicolas Cage) and Worst Remake, Rip-off or Sequel. It lost both.
During the filming of a scene where the Ghost Rider is spitting fire, Nicolas Cage actually performed the stunt himself, spitting a mixture of methanol and green dye onto a flaming ball.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources

Not any where close to being as good as the first. At least it still has Nicholas Cage. He's the only one from part one in this movie. It's just an ok movie.

Not any where close to being as good as the first. At least it still has Nicholas Cage. He's the only one from part one in this movie. It's just an ok movie.

Like the First one, this film can't find its footing. Johnny Blaze is also kind of Dan Ketch and the Ghost Rider spirit is kind of both Blaze's and Ketch's possessions. It just doesn't work. It's pulled in two directions in character and...

**It's better to forget this movie.** As I said before, in the review I wrote for “Ghost Rider”, I'm not a fan or even an expert in comics, so I'll ignore the source material and focus on the movie. I'm not the right person to say whethe...

_**Wild sequel**_ The first Ghost Rider film from 2007 was fairly faithful to the comic. When Ghost Rider came out in 1972 it was more of a general idea than a fully fleshed-out premise. This was clear as the stories changed from writer ...
Christ what kind of bum did they get to write and/or produce this one. I really, really liked the first Ghost Rider movie. This one is nowhere near that one. Sure, Nicolas Cage is doing Johnny Blaze again and they even got Christopher La...

**Loved the first Ghost Rider, this one was TERRIBLE** To be honest, i was really looking forward to see this movie, the trailer itself was eye-candy and highly exaggerated.The story is as bad as the actors' performance. Nicholas Cage is...