
Gimly
Everyone's all "Oh I heard it was a bad _Predator_ ripoff, which is why I wanted to watch it, but I wasn't prepared, I hated it so much." But like... That's exactly what it was. It's a bad _Predator_ ripoff. I wanted a bad _Predator_ ripoff...


Movie spotlight
A mad scientist's DNA experiment on the bones of a mysterious jungle creature brings the carnivorous beast to life, and only his former assistant Ash Mattley and CIA operative Claire Sommers can stop it.
A group of young adults on a camping trip stumble upon a hidden government facility conducting illegal genetic experiments. When they accidentally release a monstrous, genetically engineered creature, they find themselves hunted through the wilderness. They must race against time to survive and expose the horrific experiments before becoming the next victims.
DNA was a low-budget direct-to-video release that garnered minimal attention. Critics and audiences largely overlooked it, and it is generally considered a forgettable entry in the creature-feature genre of the late 90s. Its production values and script received little praise.
Features a poorly executed monster concept.
Lacks suspense and compelling characters.
Suffers from amateurish filmmaking and a predictable plot.
Google audience: Audience reception is largely absent due to the film's limited release and obscurity. It did not generate significant discussion or reviews.
The film was reportedly shot on a very small budget, contributing to its rudimentary special effects and overall low production quality.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources

Everyone's all "Oh I heard it was a bad _Predator_ ripoff, which is why I wanted to watch it, but I wasn't prepared, I hated it so much." But like... That's exactly what it was. It's a bad _Predator_ ripoff. I wanted a bad _Predator_ ripoff...