Safer at Home

During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of friends decides to rent an Airbnb for a virtual getaway, only to find themselves trapped in a dangerous game orchestrated by the property owner. What begins as a plan to escape lockdown quickly devolves into a fight for survival as their virtual reality blurs with a terrifying reality.

Safer at Home received a mixed to negative reception from critics, who often found its premise to be derivative and its execution lacking. While some appreciated its attempt to tap into the anxieties of the pandemic era, many felt the film failed to offer a fresh perspective or deliver sufficient scares. Audience reactions were similarly divided, with some viewers finding it a timely if flawed horror entry, while others criticized its predictable plot and underdeveloped characters.

• Attempts to capitalize on pandemic anxieties but falls short of originality.
• The film suffers from a predictable plot and uneven pacing.
• Some viewers may find its timely themes engaging, but the horror elements are largely uninspired.

Google audience: Audience reviews indicate that while the film's premise related to the pandemic was somewhat interesting, many found the execution to be predictable and not scary enough. Some viewers felt the characters were unlikable and the plot resolutions unsatisfying.

The film was shot entirely remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic, with actors performing their scenes in their own homes and communicating with the director and each other virtually.