esoul
The producers do not understand how to show that their claim "voter fraud" is true. You need to have premises(established facts) that connect with each other to then support the claim. However in this movie the producers are lacking evi...


Movie spotlight
Bestselling author and award-winning filmmaker, Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group, True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of ten trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of professional operatives, called mules, delivering fraudulent votes to mail-in boxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence obtained from official surveillance cameras corroborates the cellular positioning data. The film concludes by exploring ways to assist in the prevention of election fraud in future democratic elections.
This documentary investigates claims of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 US presidential election. It presents arguments and evidence suggesting that ballot trafficking and manipulation occurred on a large scale, utilizing geolocation data and surveillance footage to support its assertions. The film aims to uncover what its creators describe as a conspiracy to influence the election outcome.
2000 Mules has been widely criticized by news organizations and fact-checkers for its unsubstantiated claims and reliance on debunked theories. The documentary has been accused of spreading misinformation and lacking credible evidence to support its central thesis of a stolen election. Its reception has been predominantly negative from mainstream media and fact-checking bodies, while it has found a receptive audience among those who already question the integrity of the 2020 election.
The film presents speculative theories about election fraud without providing definitive proof.
Critics and fact-checkers have widely debunked the documentary's central claims.
The documentary relies heavily on conjecture and selectively presented data.
Google audience: Google users' reviews indicate that while some viewers found the documentary compelling and believed it presented a strong case for election fraud, a significant portion of users expressed skepticism, citing a lack of credible evidence and the film's controversial nature. Positive reviews often praise its investigative approach, while negative reviews frequently point to its unsubstantiated allegations and perceived bias.
The documentary was produced by Dinesh D'Souza, known for other politically charged films such as 'Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party' and 'Death of a Nation'.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources
The producers do not understand how to show that their claim "voter fraud" is true. You need to have premises(established facts) that connect with each other to then support the claim. However in this movie the producers are lacking evi...
A documentary showing one of the ways in which the 2020 US Presidential election was stolen, or "fortified" as it usually referred to by the perpetrators. This documentary shows how "mules" took advantage of unprotected dropboxes to floo...
Stop what you're doing right now. Go check FactCheck.org, Reuters, NPR, AP News, Washington Post, or any other fact-checker. **EVERYTHING IN THIS FILM IS FALSE!!!** GPS is not pinpoint accurate (anyone who has used Google Maps and seen...