Do-Gooders

The series follows a group of disillusioned social media influencers who attempt to pivot their online personas towards genuine activism. As they navigate the complexities of real-world issues, their earnest but often clumsy efforts highlight the challenges and absurdities of performative wokeness versus authentic change. The characters grapple with their own privilege and the potential for their actions to do more harm than good.

Do-Gooders received a mixed to positive reception, with critics often praising its timely satire and the performances of its lead cast. Some reviewers found the show's humor to be sharp and relevant, particularly in its examination of influencer culture and social justice discourse. However, others felt that the series occasionally struggled to balance its comedic aspirations with its more serious thematic elements, leading to an uneven tone.

• Praised for its sharp satire of influencer culture and social commentary.
• Applauded for strong comedic performances, particularly Michael Urie.
• Some critics noted an uneven balance between comedy and drama.

Google audience: Audiences generally appreciated the show's attempt to satirize modern social media trends and influencer behavior. Many found the humor effective and relatable, though a portion of viewers felt the show could be preachy at times or didn't fully explore the nuances of the issues it presented.

The series was developed as a vehicle to explore the intersection of digital activism and the often-performative nature of online influence in contemporary society.