Movie spotlight
Enough to Eat?
Edgar Anstey and Arthur Elton’s sponsored documentary on Britain’s malnutrition crisis, blending expert testimony (Julian Huxley, J. B. Orr, A. V. Hill/Gowland Hopkins) with school-meal scenes and simple charts to link low income to poor diets and argue for “protective” foods and public provision. Commissioned by the gas industry, it plays like a brisk scientific lecture-film that helped push nutrition into public debate.
Insights
Plot Summary
A young woman from a wealthy family falls in love with a poor artist, much to the disapproval of her parents. As their relationship deepens, she begins to question the superficiality of her own social circle and the values she has been raised with. The film explores themes of class, love, and the pursuit of happiness outside of societal expectations.
Critical Reception
Released in 1936, 'Enough to Eat?' was a modest drama that received mixed reviews. While some critics praised its earnest portrayal of romance and social commentary, others found its plot predictable and its social critique somewhat superficial for the era. It remains a lesser-known film from the period, often overshadowed by more prominent releases.
What Reviewers Say
Appreciated for its romantic elements and attempt at social commentary.
Criticized for a predictable narrative and lack of depth in its critique.
A competent, though unremarkable, melodrama of the 1930s.
Google audience: Audience reception information is not readily available for this 1936 film.
Fun Fact
The film was based on the novel 'So Red the Rose' by Stark Young, though it significantly altered the plot and themes for the cinematic adaptation.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources