Movie spotlight
A lowly utility worker is called to the future by a mysterious radio signal, he must leave his dying wife to embark on a journey that will force him to face his deepest fears in an attempt to change the fabric of reality and save humankind from its greatest environmental crisis yet.
In the year 2067, Earth is ravaged by climate change, with its inhabitants dying from toxic air. Jude, a young man, receives a message from the future urging him to travel to the future and save humanity. He embarks on a perilous journey to a dying world, facing the ghosts of his past and confronting the stark reality of his mission.
2067 received a generally mixed to negative reception from critics and audiences. While praised for its ambitious visual effects and production design, the film was often criticized for its derivative plot, uneven pacing, and underdeveloped characters. The narrative struggles to deliver on its intriguing premise, leading to a sense of disappointment for many viewers.
Visually impressive with striking CGI and production design.
Suffers from a predictable and unoriginal storyline.
Fails to fully explore its compelling themes and character arcs.
Google audience: Audience reviews indicate a division, with some appreciating the film's visual spectacle and the underlying environmental message. However, many expressed disappointment with the screenplay, finding it to be a rehash of familiar sci-fi tropes and lacking emotional depth. The pacing and character development were frequently cited as weak points.
The film was shot entirely in Australia, with many of its futuristic cityscapes and desolate landscapes created using extensive visual effects.
AI-generated overview · Verify ratings on official sources
I live in Sydney, a city which suffered its worst air quality in ten years in 2020 due to smoke caused by bushfires. Not only that, but a long-promised clean air strategy for the state of New South Wales is already three years overdue. Defo...